Der kommende Blockchain-Bürgerkrieg – BitcoinBlog.de – das ...

Questions about technical / political / economic / "game theory" aspects of BU & ViaBTC. (1) With BU, can non-mining (full) nodes influence blocksize? (2) Should ViaBTC open-source their private relay network software? (3) Which is more anti-fragile: a ViaBTC/BU future, or a Core/SegWit future?

Some of these issues were raised briefly in today's AMA with Haipo Yang, founder and CEO of ViaBTC:
Mining vs non-mining nodes
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/5ddiqw/im_haipo_yang_founder_and_ceo_of_viabtc_ask_me/da3wszm/
What do you think of the influence of non-mining node operators under Bitcoin Unlimited's model for voting on maximum block size? Do you think that non-mining nodes signaling for a certain size would truly motivate miners to not exceed that size?
~ u/ChronosCrypto (Bitcoin Vlogger)
I believe that with the Bitcoin Unlimited method, the influence of non-mining nodes on the block size is very limited.
~ u/ViaBTC
ViaBTC's closed-source relay network
https://np.reddit.com/btc/comments/5ddiqw/im_haipo_yang_founder_and_ceo_of_viabtc_ask_me/da3uvpv/
Are you using the Bitcoin FIBRE relay network bitcoinfibre.org?
~ u/core_negotiator (Note: This person is not a "Core negotiator". There is no such thing.)
No, we use our own system [which was] developed by myself. It is much better.
~ u/ViaBTC
[Have you] Thought about having that incorporated into BU (even giving access to BU miners)? I ask because looking at some of your pool's first-job times, it looks your system is quite impressive and it'd be a massive slap in the face for core's RN et al
~ u/pekatete
I am very happy that other pool would like join our network.
~ u/ViaBTC
Why don't you open source it to help improve the network?
~ u/messiano84
haha so when will you open source it?
~ u/yeh-nah-yeh
Should we be concerned that ViaBTC will have a lot of hashing power - and they will be using a private, close-source relay network?
There is probably a lot of discussion we could have on this topic.
I like ViaBTC - but it seems strange that he did not address this point very much in his AMA.
Are we going to have to "trust ViaBTC" now and "trust" their closed-source private relay network software?
This seems like this would be a point of centralization / vulnerability in the network - where ViaBTC could abuse his power, or other players could attack ViaBTC, and harm Bitcoin itself.
How does BU "signaling" work - in a non-mining (fully-validating) node, vs a mining node.
One question quoted above from the AMA was:
Do you think that non-mining nodes signaling for a certain size would truly motivate miners to not exceed that size?
I understand there are multiple parameters involved in "signaling":
  • EB = excessive blocksize
  • AD = acceptance depth
(Are there other parameters too? I can't remember.)
Here is a Medium post by ViaBTC where he proposes some strategies for setting these parameters, in order to safely hard fork to bigger blocks with BU:
Miner Guide: How to Safely Hard Fork to Bitcoin Unlimited
https://medium.com/@ViaBTC/miner-guide-how-to-safely-hard-fork-to-bitcoin-unlimited-8ac1570dc1a8#.akijaiba7
Could we have some more discussion on how "signaling for" blocksizes works - under various possible future scenarios (optimistic / pessimistic... likely / unlikely / black-swan)?
There are various future scenarios (after the network has eventually / presumably forked from Core to BU) where people could use BU's parameters to realize certain results on the network.
(1) What are some of those future scenarios?
  • economic / political / technical events which could abruptly affect Bitcoin network traffic
    • already: Chinese currency (Yuan) dropping against US currency (dollar)
    • already: India demonetizing Rs 500 and Rs 1000 notes
    • likely: major ETF getting approved in the US (Winklevoss or other)
    • possible: additional spam attacks on the Bitcoin network
    • ...from white hats (testing the system; pointing out vulnerabilities; making a statement)
    • ...from black hats (another coin; a bot-net; pro-Core and/or anti-BU users; state / corporate actors; Mircea Popescu?)
    • black swan: some government does something weird & unexpected impacting financial markets and/or Bitcoin
    • ... Trump administration : some high-level person (who's actually just an alt-right blogger that Trump hired to run some major governnent department) makes some crazy pronouncement / ruling about the internet / about the markets (FCC eliminates network neutrality? T-Bill sale fails?)
    • ... Fed : rate hike? more helicopter money?
    • ... Europe : Deutsche Bank collapses? Merkel / ECB decides to rescue / not rescue them? bail-ins?
    • ... China : China bans Bitcoin again? releases their own crypto? imposes new capital controls? Bitcoin price goes moon and CNY crashes so Chinese govt imposes emergency ban on all traffic across Great Firewall - cutting off 80% of mining from the West?
    • ... Russian hackers? some 400 pound guy on his bed? 4chan? whoever took down a big chunk of the DNS a few weeks ago?
(2) What are some possible (typical, atypical... benevolent, malicious... altruistic, selfish... defensive, proactive... pessimistic, optimistic ) BU parameter-setting strategies which people might adopt in those scenarios?
  • Which software is more safe / more dangerous... more anti-fragile / more fragile in the above scenarios?
    • Core/SegWit 1-1.7M blocksize (assuming wallet / exchange software gets upgraded for SegWit)?
    • users "signaling for" blocksize on the network using parameters in Bitcoin Unlimited?
(3) Can we start putting together a comprehensive strategic "threat (and opportunity) assessment" on those various possible future scenarios / strategies - ranking various threats (and opportunities) in terms of impact as well as probability?
  • How would the network react to threats/opportunities using BU (with most mining still concentrated in China, and maybe also concetrated on ViaBTC's private closed-source relay network)?
  • How would the network react to threats/opportunities using Core/SegWit?
(4) A lot of the discussion about BU is among miners - mostly in China - and maybe later many miners will be using the ViaBTC pool - which is also offering a cloud mining option... so perhaps it is normal & expected that most of the discussion about BU parameters revolves around miners.
  • What about non-mining (fully-validating) nodes in a BU world?
  • What about SPV clients and servers in a BU world?
  • Do non-mining (fully-validating) nodes also have some role to play in helping to set the blocksize, and helping to secure and grow the network, based on setting BU parameters? Or with BU, only the miners decide?
  • Can non-mining (fully-validating) nodes prevent blocks from getting too big?
  • How would SPV clients and servers work in a BU world? Can they actively participate in helping to decide blocksize?
(5) Does BU give miners "all the power" - and so blocksize goes to 2 MB, 4 MB, 8 MB - and then some users from low-bandwidth geographic regions can no longer run full nodes at home?
(6) If we have a period of 1-2 weeks where "bigger blocks" get mined (eg, 2 MB, or 4 MB), and then we decide we don't like it, can everyone "signal for" smaller blocks after a couple of weeks of bigger blocks? Can the chain reverts to a smaller blocksize, after a brief, one-week "bulge" of bigger blocks?
(7) If we have an isolated incident where a single very-big block gets appended to the chain & accepted to a sufficient depth (say, an 8 MB block or a 32 MB, that some miner somehow managed get accepted on the chain)
  • Can the chain revert to smaller blocks after an isolated incident of one very-big block?
  • Or are we "stuck" with that bigger blocksize forever, simply because one got mined in the past?
(8) Remember BitPay Adaptive Blocksize? One of the nice things about it was that its consensus-forming mechanism was based on taking a median of what people were signalling - and the median is a more robust statistic (harder to fake/sybil?).
Can any ideas from BitPay Adaptive Blocksize (eg, using the median) be incorporated into Bitcoin Unlimited?
These are just some initial questions.
Other people probably have many more.
Hopefully we can have some good discussion and analysis, so we can keep the network safe & growing.
submitted by ydtm to btc [link] [comments]

Does bitcoin-qt get hacked?

Wondering about how secure bitcoin-qt is as a standalone, without armory, but with passphrase encryption. I'd imagine anyone hacking would probably have their time better spent going after lighter wallets and internet wallets, but I don't know shit.
Also, what makes Mircea Popescu so great that his exchange has never been hacked? Still too small scale, or is he really maybe more than a tenth as great as he thinks he is?
submitted by gaurdianofnations to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Cumpara Bitcoin - Cum sa cumperi bitcoin usor pe BitcoinX.ro Uploads from BitcoinMeister - YouTube Green Address Digital Wallet Sign Up and Getting Started Tutorial For Beginners Green Address Bitcoin Wallet - Segwit, RBF, 2FA, Multisig and More ESTE PREA TARZIU SA CUMPERI BITCOIN?

Bitcoin. comments; other discussions (2) Want to join? Log in or sign up in seconds. English; limit my search to r/Bitcoin. use the following search parameters to narrow your results: subreddit:subreddit find submissions in "subreddit" author:username find submissions by "username" site:example.com find submissions from "example.com" url:text search for "text" in url selftext:text search for ... Gales Bitcoin Wallet spec and battle plan « Fixpoint (via Pingback) Thursday, 28 November 2019 [...] no S-expressions or JSON or similar. I believe this also brings it in closer alignment with the ideal. A second simplification is in the storage of addresses and keys, following a philosophy of "the [...] 8 [G]ossipd design document on Trilema - A blog by Mircea Popescu. (via Pingback ... The ideal Bitcoin wallet. 30 July 2016 Author: Mircea Popescu. Category: Bitcoin 9 responses. My First Bitcoin, or How Do I Get Some Satoshi ? 27 July 2016 Author: Mircea Popescu. Category: Bitcoin 2 responses. How to correctly value forked chains ? 26 July 2016 Author: Mircea Popescu. Category: Bitcoin 6 responses. How #bitcoin-assets was born. 23 June 2016 Author: Mircea ... I remember reading a while ago Mircea Popescu’s ridiculous article, where he states something like Bitcoin is perfectly anonymous. His reasoning went like this: Blockchain analysis cannot make ... Auch Mircea Popescu, rumänischer Betreiber einer etwas seltsamen Bitcoin-Anleihen-Börse (MPex) ... Kriegt ihr auch so viel Bitcoin-Spam auf euer Wallet? Ich krieg ständig einzelne Satoshis + ein Haufen Werbung überwiesen 😦 TH // 2. Februar 2015 um 23:36 // Also mir ist es in etwas über einem Jahr glaube ich zwei oder dreimal passiert, wobei ich aber auch eine ganze Menge Adressen ...

[index] [1982] [40011] [26628] [19401] [364] [22941] [46620] [27417] [7135] [3398]

Cumpara Bitcoin - Cum sa cumperi bitcoin usor pe BitcoinX.ro

Care sunt cele 4 etape a oricarei piete. Asta te va ajuta sa ingelegi cand este cel mai bun moment de a cumpara orice activ financiar inclusiv Bitcoin Bogdan Popescu 22,817 views. 17:22. How To Create Bitcoin Wallet - Best Wallet For Indian Users 💰#02 - Duration: 12:11. Billi 4 You Recommended for you. 12:11. Instalarea si prima pornire a ... Green Address Cryptocurrency Digital Wallet Sign Up and Getting Started Tutorial For Beginners 2018 Green Address is a user-friendly Bitcoin wallet thats an excellent choice for beginners. How To Get A Bitcoin Wallet: Blue Wallet for iPhone and Android - Duration: 29:49. BTC Sessions 1,327 views. 29:49. Mix Play all Mix - BTC Sessions YouTube; My Top ... Today I take a look at a more advanced option for mobile wallets: Green Address. In includes things like Segwit addresses, RBF (replace by fee), 2FA (2 factor authentication) and multi-signature ...

#